Models of Heritage Tourism Sustainable Planning: The Case of the Island of Mljet

Mrda, Ana, Caric, Hrvoje and Bojanic Obad Scitaroci, Bojana (2018) Models of Heritage Tourism Sustainable Planning: The Case of the Island of Mljet. In: ICOMOS 19th General Assembly and Scientific Symposium "Heritage and Democracy", 13-14th December 2017, New Delhi, India. [Conference or Workshop Item]

[img]
Preview
PDF
33._ICOA_1657_Mrda_SM.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract (in English)

The paper examines the dialog between cultural and natural heritage and tourism, and advocates sustainable approach to tourism planning in cultural landscapes. The study is based on the theory models of heritage tourism sustainable planning that act as a catalyst for tourist attractiveness and the recognisability of the destination. From the spatial-planning point of view, the competitiveness of the destination is based on the cultural experience of unique spatial units and on the regional quality of the environment and landscape, which recognize how the interaction between tourism and heritage can promote quality of the destination as a place to live, work and invest. Models of heritage tourism sustainable planning imply the harmony and balance between the global tourism standards and the preservation of the cultural identity of the destination. They are comprised of two main components: an autochthonous place and its cultural and socioeconomic characteristics and viable tourism scenario and its sustainable cultural product. A case study is carried out on the Croatian Island of Mljet, the oldest National Park in the Adriatic, the island which combines myths, legends and cultural historical processes from the stone age, the periods of Illyrians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Slavs, Republic of Dubrovnik, Austro-Hungarian empire, up to the present times. The research, based on the all stakeholder visual perception questionnaire, proves that the heritage tourism sustainable planning models must support the development of tourism without jeopardizing the spatial and socioeconomic characteristics of both natural and anthropogenic features of the area and without creating social or economic difficulties for the local community. At the same time, they must be possible to regulate the visitor capacity which is consistent with the image of the destinations’ lifescape and with the quality of the cultural tourism experience of the visitors.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Authors:
AuthorsEmail
Mrda, AnaUNSPECIFIED
Caric, HrvojeUNSPECIFIED
Bojanic Obad Scitaroci, BojanaUNSPECIFIED
Languages: English
Keywords: heritage tourism; cultural landscapes; sustainable planning; lifescape; natural heritage; cultural heritage; tourism planning; sustainable planning; interaction; cultural identity; Croatia; Adriatic; stakeholder; community
Subjects: H.HERITAGE TYPOLOGIES > 06. Cultural landscapes
I.CULTURAL TOURISM > 02. Tourism management
I.CULTURAL TOURISM > 04. Sustainable tourism
J.HERITAGE ECONOMICS > 05. Heritage and sustainable development
L.PRESENTATION AND TRANSMISSION OF HERITAGE > 04. Public awareness
P. GEOGRAPHIC AREAS > 05. Europe
National Committee: ICOMOS
ICOMOS Special Collection: Scientific Symposium (ICOMOS General Assemblies)
Depositing User: intern icomos
Date Deposited: 23 Nov 2018 15:49
Last Modified: 23 Nov 2018 15:49
References: 1. Antrop M. (2005). “Why landscapes of the past are important for the future”. Landscape and

Urban Planning. 70. p. 21-34.

2. Cartier, C. and Lew, A. A. (2005): Seductions of Place: Geographical Perspectives on

Globalization and Touristed Landscapes (Critical Geographies). London and New York:

Routledge.

3. DuplančićLeder, T., Ujević, T., Čala, M. (2004): Coastline lengths and areas of islands in the

Croatian part of the Adriatic sea determined from the topographic maps at the scale of 1 : 25 000.

Geoadria. 1. p. 5-32.

4. Farid, S.M. (2015). “Tourism Management in World Heritage Sites and its Impact on Economic

Development in Mali and Ethiopia”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 211. p. 595-604.

5. Farina A. (2000): “The Cultural Landscape as a Model for the Integration of Ecology and

Economics”. BioScience. 50. p. 313-320.

6. Gunn, C. A., (1972.): Vacationscape - designing tourist region. Austin: The Univ. Of Texas.

7. Jacobsen, J. and Steen K. (2007): “Use of landscape perception methods in tourism studies: A

review of photo-based research approaches”. Tourism Geographies. 9. p. 234-253.

8. Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. (1978): Humanscape: Environments for people. Belmont, Calif:

Duxbury Press.

9. Loulanski, T. and Loulanski, V. (2015): “The sustainable integration of cultural heritage and

tourism: a meta-study”. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 19. p.837-862.

10. McCain, G. and Ray N.M. (2003). “Legacy tourism: the search for personal meaning in heritage

travel”. Tourism Management. 24. p.713-717.

11. Metro-Roland, M. M. (2011): Tourists, Signs and the City: The Semiotics of Culture in an Urban

Landscape. Farnham, England: Ashgate Publishing

12. Mrđa, A. (2015): ‘Method for Determining Tourism Carrying Capacity in Spatial Planning’,

PhD, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Architecture, Zagreb.

13. Mrđa, A. and BojanićObadŠćitaroci, B. (2014): “The Importance of the Concept of Tourism

Carrying Capacity for Spatial Planning - Previous Research, Development and Methodological

Approaches”. Prostor. 22. p. 212-227.

14. Mrđa, A. and BojanićObadŠćitaroci, B. (2016): “Heritage touristscapes: a case study of the Island

of Hvar”. Annales-AnalizaIstrske in MediteranskeStudije-Series Historia et Sociologia. 26. p.

553-572.

15. OECD. (2009). The Impact of Culture on Tourism. [Acessed October 4, 2016].

[http://www.oecd.org/cfe/tourism/theimpactofcultureontourism.htm]

16. Rodríguez-Darias, A., Santana-Talavera, A., Díaz-Rodríguez P. (2016). “Landscape Perceptions

and Social Evaluation of Heritage-Building Processes”. Environmental Policy and Governance.

Wiley Online Library.

17. Samsudin, P. Y. and Maliki, N. Z. (2015): “Preserving Cultural Landscape in Homestay

Programme towards Sustainable Tourism: Brief critical review concept”. Procedia - Social and

Behavioral Sciences. 170. p. 433-441.

18. Soini, K. and Vaarala, H., Pouta, E. (2012). “Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions

at the rural–urban interface”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 104. p. 124-134.

19. Stebbins, R. A. (1996). “Cultural Tourism as Serious Leisure”. Annals of Tourism Research. 23.

p. 948-950.

20. Stephenson, J. (2008): “The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in

landscapes”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 84. p. 127-139.

21. Swensen, G. and Jerpasen, G. B. (2008): “Cultural heritage in suburban landscape planning: A

case study in Southern Norway”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 87. p. 289-300.

22. von Haaren, C. (2002): “Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural

landscape”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 60. p. 73-80.

23. Vos, W., Meekes H. (1999): “Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives

for a sustainable future”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 46. p. 3-14.
URI: http://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/1953

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Metadata

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

© ICOMOS
http://www.international.icomos.org
openarchive(at)icomos.org