creators_nameGajare, Rashmi
creators_nameTaru, /
typeconference_item
datestamp2018-12-18 15:34:42
lastmod2019-11-14 16:04:04
metadata_visibilityshow
titleAdivasi Identity, Haunting and Reconciliation- Negotiating Cultural Memory and Displacement
ispublishedpub
subjectsL04
subjectsL07
subjectsN03
subjectsO02
subjectsP04
full_text_statuspublic
pres_typepaper
keywordsadivasi
keywordsidentity
keywordsconflict
keywordsreconciliation
keywordshuman rights
keywordshaunting
keywordscultural memory
keywordsethnography
keywordsIndia
keywordssegregation
keywordsminority
keywordsostracising
keywordsuntouchability
abstractPalimpsest and ‘ghost’ have been an integral part of studies on cultural memory, erasure and its ‘haunting’. Be it Jacque Derrida’s use of ‘spectral bodies’ to analyse the ‘phantomatic’ in ideology or Foucault’s unraveling of ‘haunting’ in his interview, “Film and Popular Memory,” it is accepted that pieces of identity and memory remain as imprints that drive and influence the individual or the community experiencing such ‘haunting.’ The Adivasi way of life is pluralistic, where each community has its own dynamic oral history, and allegorical understanding of their habitats. Their idea of the sacred, like the sarna, often herald to spirits of their ancestors and derive the ‘sacred’ from the living history, their cultural identity from their life in the forests and now, with increasing loss of habitat (Jal, Jangal, Jameen), memory. This research explores the nuances of the Adivasi identity and the ramifications of displacement on their collective memory by exploring a palimpsest of the Adivasi way of life as it survives and morphs, despite an era of displacement and erasure and as they struggle for acknowledgment and survival. While conflict ruptures familiar systems of living, cultural memory is a representative form that assists in attempts to recreate a past and foster reconciliation of ‘identity’ in the present. Utilizing ethnographic studies of grassroot organizations, an analysis of contemporary Adivasi literature and individual interviews of Adivasis involved in the advocacy efforts in Bihar and Jharkhand, this research seeks to map the ways the Adivasis and the grass-root organizations negotiate the conflictridden landscape to evolve as a society even as they seek to legitimize, preserve and celebrate critical aspects of what is self-recognized (in their own literature) as a five thousand year-old ‘othered’ culture of India, often de-legitimized or alienated in the face of the mainstream ideology of the time.
date2018
date_typepublished
event_titleICOMOS 19th General Assembly and Scientific Symposium "Heritage and Democracy"
event_locationNew Delhi, India
event_dates13-14th December 2017
event_typeother
refereedTRUE
referencetextAssman, J. (2008) Originalveröffentlichung in: Astrid Erll, AnsgarNünning (Hg.), Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook, Berlin, New York 2008, S. 109-118 Central Tibetan Administration, (2017) Department of Education, http://tibet.net/department/education. Accessed November 14, 2017 Goverment of Zharkhand. (2017, October 30). Goverment of Zharkhand. Retrieved October 30, 2017, from http://www.jharkhand.gov.in/ Government of India. (26 January 1950). The Constitution of India.National Legislative Bodies/National Authorities. Halbwachs, M. (1992).On Collective Memory. (L. A. Coser, Trans.) The University of Chicago Press. HansdaSowvendraShekhar, (2015)The Adivasi Won’t Dance, Speaking Tiger Publishing Pvt. Ltd Huyssen, A. (2003). Diaspora and Nation: Migration into Other Pasts. New German Critique, Winter(88), 147-164. Jewitt, Sarah. 2008. "Political ecology of Jharkhand conflicts." Asia Pacific Viewpoint, Vol. 49, , No. 1 pp68–82. KrishanuMukherji, (2017) ww.bloombergquint.com/business/2017/02/17/jharkhand-signs-209-mousworth-rs-3-lakh-crore-in-investment-summit.February 17. Accessed November 14, 2017 Ministry of Tribal Affairs, S. D. (2013).Statistical Profile of Scheduled Tribes and castes.Government of India. Munda, R. D., and S BosuMullik. (2003). The Jharkhand Movement - Indigenous Peoples' Struggle for Autonomy in India. Copenhagen: IWGIA, BIRSA. RT. Anon. (See note in abstract.)(2014) Interview in Hindi by Taru.Conversation on the Adivasi world vision (July 5). Translated by Taru SM. Anon. (See note in abstract.) (2014) Interview in Hindi by Taru.Post Movement: Conversations with NGO workers (July). Translated by Taru. Shah, A. (2010).In the shadows of the state: indigenous politics, environmentalism, and insurgency in Jharkhand, India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Sundar, Nandini. (2009). "Framing the Political Imagination." In Legal Grounds, by NandiniSundar, Delhi: Oxford University Press. Survival International Charitable Trust, n.d. http://www.notprimitive.in/. Accessed November 14, 2017. Taru, Kudva, N., & Forester, J. F. (2015).NGOs in the face of Conflict and Structural Violence: The Jharkhand Story Toppo, Richard. (2012). Jharkhand: The failed promise of an adivasi state. July 12. Accessed April 11, 2015. http://infochangeindia.org/human-rights/analysis/jharkhand-the-failed-promise-of-an-adivasistate.html
citation Gajare, Rashmi et Taru, / (2018) Adivasi Identity, Haunting and Reconciliation- Negotiating Cultural Memory and Displacement. In: ICOMOS 19th General Assembly and Scientific Symposium "Heritage and Democracy", 13-14th December 2017, New Delhi, India. [Document issu d'une conférence ou d'un atelier]
document_urlhttps://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/1999/1/26._ICOA_1720_Gajare_SM_with-warning.pdf