<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Foreword</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Toshiyuki</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Kono</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Traditionally, regulatory approach has been the typical methodology for conservation of heritage, i.e. prohibition and regulation combined with some incentive measures. This has been the most effective way for relationships between owner and authority. But&#13;
how could the legislator cope with new situations, i.e. the expansion [or changes] of values and more involvement of communities in rapidly changing societies? What would be adequate design of legal tool to cope with emerging situations? The ICLAFI Conference organized in 2016 by ICOMOS Estonia, “Historical Perspective on Heritage Legislation – Balance between Laws and Values”, was a great opportunity to reflect such important questions for heritage conservation.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">07. Histoire de la conservation</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">07. Gestion</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">11. Protection juridique et administration</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">03. Législations nationales et régionales</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2017-01</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>ICLAFI, ICOMOS Estonia NC, Estonian Academy ofArts</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Chapitre de livres</mods:genre></mods:mods>