<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Vision and Reality: Evolution of the Winning Competition Entry for the New Town Hall Complex in Ljubljana</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Ilka</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Čerpes</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The urban and architectural design competition for a new town hall was executed in 2009 by&#13;
the Municipality of Ljubljana. The main question of the competition was if the new complex&#13;
of public activities and public buildings could reinforce the urban development of the eastern&#13;
edge of the existing city centre where extensive brownfield areas and abandoned industrial&#13;
zones had been stopping the urban growth for years.&#13;
&#13;
The intervention site comprises an area of 3 hectares (30.000 square metres) and currently&#13;
no active public functions or buildings are situated there. However, all around there&#13;
are many important fragments of architectural heritage from different historical eras&#13;
(a protected old sugar factory from the first half of the 18th century, a small Baroque&#13;
palace from the 18th century, a river barrier on the Ljubljanica from the 20th century&#13;
by the famous Slovenian architect Plečnik and an excellent example of the 20th century&#13;
modernist architecture in the form of a double round parking garage); however all of these structures are shrinking in terms of physical and functional conditions. A huge effort&#13;
from the winning architectural team and the competition jury was made to preserve the&#13;
heritage by the integration of all existing protected and unprotected historical building&#13;
fragments into the building complex of a new municipal town hall in the sense of design and&#13;
function. But further development of the project shows that they had underestimated the&#13;
obstacles related to high investment costs and legal procedures that are not defined well&#13;
enough. Currently, the development of the project has been halted and, in fact, a very small&#13;
possibility of realisation exists.&#13;
&#13;
The scope of this paper is to discuss the main reasons for the project failure, which lie in&#13;
legal obstacles and unsuccessfully provided public investment strategies, and to propose the&#13;
possible follow-up activities for a more proactive safeguarding of the cultural heritage in the&#13;
fields of architecture and urban design.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">02. Urbanisme</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">09. Aspects économiques et sociaux de la conservation</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">11. Protection juridique et administration</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">03. Législations nationales et régionales</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">05. Europe</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2014</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>ICOMOS/SI</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Chapitre de livres</mods:genre></mods:mods>