An extended viewpoint on reconstruction in the World Heritage context: towards new guidance

Khalaf, Roha W. (2018) An extended viewpoint on reconstruction in the World Heritage context: towards new guidance. ICOMOS University Forum, 1 . p. 1-17. ISSN 2616-6968 [Article]

Prévisualisation

PDF 5_Khalaf.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (419kB) | Prévisualisation

Résumé (en anglais)

‘If a World Heritage property is destroyed and later reconstructed, could it still be recognized as World Heritage?’ was the topic of my abstract, selected for the workshop of the ICOMOS University Forum on Authenticity and Reconstructions. I had already published a paper to propose a potential solution to this question involving the creation of a new category of contemporary cultural heritage in concert with the qualifying conditions of continuity, compatibility and distinction. The current paper gradually develops the underlying ideas. I argue that a reconstructed property is a contemporary re-creation and should be assessed as such to determine if it could ‘still be recognized’ – i.e. if it qualifies – ‘as World Heritage’. For this reason, I examine in depth the qualifying conditions that I had briefly suggested. I explain that continuity could underpin authenticity while compatibility and distinction could underpin integrity. Indicators are identified for each qualifying condition to support ‘thoughtful decision-making’ and to preserve ‘the credibility of the brand’, which are key points raised at the workshop. Moreover, paragraphs 86 and 88 of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention are rephrased to highlight the implications of the central argument. As a consequence, an answer is provided not only to the question assigned to my discussion group, ‘where is authenticity now?’, but also to ‘where is integrity now?’ Finally, I address two issues discussed in my group, namely forgery and validity, to conclude my reflections. The ideas expressed here may encourage an international exchange of viewpoints towards developing new guidance.

Type:	Article
Auteurs:	Auteurs E-mail Khalaf, Roha W. NON SPECIFIÉ
Langues:	Anglais
Mots-clés libres:	cultural heritage; Conservation of cultural heritage; philosophy of conservation; theory of restoration; reconstruction; World Heritage; Qualifying condition; authenticity; Continuity; Compatibility; Distinction; Integrity
Sujets:	A. ASPECTS GENERAUX ET THEORIQUES > 09. Philosophie de la conservation A. ASPECTS GENERAUX ET THEORIQUES > 12. Théorie de la restauration N.ANTHROPOLOGIE > 01. Généralités P. ZONES GEOGRAPHIQUES > 01. Amériques
Comité national de l’ICOMOS:	ICOMOS International
Volume:	1
ISSN:	2616-6968
Déposé par:	ICOMOS DocCentre
Date de dépôt:	12 mars 2018 15:48
Dernière modification:	16 avril 2018 08:40
Références:	Díaz-Andreu, M. 2017. ‘Heritage values and the public’, Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 4: 1, pp. 2-6. Funari, P.P.A. 1994. ‘Paulo Duarte e o Instituto de Pré-História’. Idéias, 1:1, pp. 155-179. Funari, P.P.A. & Garraffoni, R.S. ‘Participatory archaeology and community empowerment in Brazil’. Complutum, 27, 2016: 281-294. Funari, P.P.A. & Bezerra, M. 2013. ‘Arqueologia Pública na América Latina’, in: Machardo, G.; Souza, F.C.A.; Steinbach, J. (orgs), Educação Patrimonial e Arqueologia Pública, Joinville: Casa Aberta Editora, pp. 75-100. Jones, S. 2017. ‘Wrestling with the social value of Heritage: problems, dilemmas and opportunities’, Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 4: 1, pp. 21-37. Little, B.J. 2007. Historical Archaeology – why the past matters? Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press. Mendonça, J.M.N. & Ramos, R.W. 2017. ‘Afro-brasileiros no Museu Paranaense: silêncios, demandas públicas e ressignificações’, Revista Observatório, 3: 2, pp. 113-135. Olivier, A. 2017. ‘Communities of interest: challenging approaches’, Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 4: 1, pp. 7-20. Rago, L. M. 2013. A Aventura de contar-se: feminismos, escrita de si e invenções da subjetividade. Campinas-SP: Editora da Unicamp. Rockman, M & Flatman 2013. J. (eds) Archaeology in Society – its relevance in the Modern World, New York: Springer. Silberman, N. 2012. ‘Heritage interpretation and human rights: documenting diversity, expressing identity or establishing universal principal?’ International Journay of Heritage Studies, pp. 1-12. Tamanini, E. 2013. ‘Educação em Museus como anúncio e resistência popular: o desafio da construção de política pública’, in: Machardo, G.; Souza, F.C.A.; Steinbach, J. (orgs), Educação Patrimonial e Arqueologia Pública, Joinville: Casa Aberta Editora, pp. 07-17.
URI:	https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/1853

Actions (login required)

Fiche du document

Metadata

• HTML Citation
• ASCII Citation
• Full
• OpenURL ContextObject
• EndNote
• BibTeX
• MODS
• MPEG-21 DIDL
• EP3 XML
• Dublin Core
• Reference Manager
• Eprints Application Profile
• Simple Metadata
• Refer
• METS

Downloads