Ars Memoria

Uskokovic, Sandra (2018) Ars Memoria. In: ICOMOS 19th General Assembly and Scientific Symposium "Heritage and Democracy", 13-14th December 2017, New Delhi, India. [Document issu d'une conférence ou d'un atelier]

Prévisualisation

PDF 23._ICOA_1167_Uskoković_SM.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (2MB) | Prévisualisation

Résumé (en anglais)

A view on the history and memory in former Yugoslavia is ranging from victimization through amnesia to nostalgia. What these opposing positions have in common is their failure to recognize the full complexity of the phenomenon of collective memory and of the region's history of struggle over concepts of identity, nation, conflict and reconciliation, and the contradictory lessons of the past. As well as the other states created after the fall of socialist Yugoslavia, Croatia has deployed national symbols strategically to promote favourable images of its heritage in “nation branding“ in order to create identity of difference. Heritage is the best example that in some ways always represents conditions of conflict in space, as the very tool and consequence of politics. For example, the reconstruction with the facsimile method of the Old Bridge in Mostar (that was destroyed in war conflict) was an attempt to reconcile the antagonism of divided city and unify it - what unfortunately did not ever happen. Therefore this “new-old” bridge that originally represented multinational identity of the city, represents today contested identity of the city and certainly did not help or enable post-conflict reconciliation. Nation state along with expert community actually produced “image of identity representation” using heritage as a social-political resource. There is too much memory on Balkans, too many pasts on which people can draw, usually as a weapon against the past of someone else. Cynicism and mistrust pervade all social, cultural and even personal exchanges so that the reconciliation is very difficult. There are multiple memories and historical myths that form powerful counter-histories of a mutually antagonistic and divisive nature. Destruction of heritage on Balkans (along with ethnic cleansing) should be viewed as a form of “construction”, which aided in the production of the new, exclusive and mono cultural identities.

Type:	Document issu d'une conférence ou d'un atelier (Article)
Auteurs:	Auteurs E-mail Uskokovic, Sandra NON SPECIFIÉ
Langues:	Anglais
Mots-clés libres:	conflict; reconciliation; identity; heritage; Yugoslavia; collective memory; history; nation branding; post-conflict; Balkans
Sujets:	E.CONSERVATION ET RESTAURATION > 09. Aspects économiques et sociaux de la conservation G.DEGRADATION > 02. Facteur de dégradation K.QUESTIONS LEGALES ET ADMINISTRATIVES > 03. Législations nationales et régionales L.PRESENTATION ET TRANSMISSION DU PATRIMOINE > 04. Sensibilisation du public P. ZONES GEOGRAPHIQUES > 05. Europe
Comité national de l’ICOMOS:	ICOMOS International
Collections spéciales:	Scientific Symposium (ICOMOS General Assemblies)
Volume de la collection spéciale:	19th General Assembly, New Delhi, 2017
Déposé par:	intern icomos
Date de dépôt:	18 décembre 2018 15:36
Dernière modification:	18 décembre 2018 15:36
Références:	Assmann, A. (2011). Opasnasjećanjaipomirenje: Transformativnasnagasjećanja. Rijeka: Ex libris. p. 195-213. Erjavec, A. (2008). Postmodernism and the postsocialist condition, Politicized art under Socialism, Berkeley: University of California Press. 1-54. Esbenshade, S. (1995). “Remembering to Forget: Memory, History, national Identity in Post war EastCentral Europe.” Representations 49. p.72-96. Hays, K. (1984). “Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form.” Perspecta21. p.14-29. Kirn, G. (2012). “Spomenicisudiojugoslavenskogemancipacijskogprojekta,” Novosti670 .http://www.novossti.com/2012/10/spomenici-su-dio-jugoslavenskog-emancipacijskog-projekta. Muller, N. (2009). “Denkmal und Representation: Alt und Neu in Der Denkmalkultur“. Erinnerungskultur in Dalmatien, VomParisanenkultzurReprasentation der Nationalstaatlichkeit, p.26-34. Niedermuller, P. (1999). “Ethnicity, nationality, and the Myth of cultural heritage: A European view.” Journal of Folklore Research 36. p.1-54. Panovski, P. (2006). “New Old Times in the Balkans the Search for a Cultural Identity.” Journal of Performance and Art 28. p. 61-74. Rivera, L. (2008). “Managing Spoiled National Identity: War, Tourism and Memory in Croatia,” American Sociological Review73. p.613-634. Ministry of Culture of Republic of Croatia, National Register of Monuments, http://www.minkulture.hr/default.aspx?id=8275 1 Postozaumjetnost, http://1postozaumjetnost.wordpress.com/texts/ Subversive Urbanism, “A transcendental alternative to Balkan reality: Bogdan Bogdanović,” “http://subversiveurbanism.tumblr.com/post/22802654170/a-transcendental-alternative-to-balkan-realitybogdan Večernji list, “Petrovagora –spomeniksramote,” http://www.vecernji.hr/kultura/petrova-gora-spomeniksramote-clanak-468653 Virtual Museum Dotrščina, Zagreb, http://www.dotrscina.hr/
URI:	https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/1996

Actions (login required)

Fiche du document

Metadata

• HTML Citation
• ASCII Citation
• Full
• OpenURL ContextObject
• EndNote
• BibTeX
• MODS
• MPEG-21 DIDL
• EP3 XML
• Dublin Core
• Reference Manager
• Eprints Application Profile
• Simple Metadata
• Refer
• METS

Downloads