Models of Heritage Tourism Sustainable Planning: The Case of the Island of Mljet
Mrda, Ana, Caric, Hrvoje and Bojanic Obad Scitaroci, Bojana (2018) Models of Heritage Tourism Sustainable Planning: The Case of the Island of Mljet. In: ICOMOS 19th General Assembly and Scientific Symposium "Heritage and Democracy", 13-14th December 2017, New Delhi, India. [Conference or Workshop Item]
|
PDF
33._ICOA_1657_Mrda_SM.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract (in English)
The paper examines the dialog between cultural and natural heritage and tourism, and advocates sustainable approach to tourism planning in cultural landscapes. The study is based on the theory models of heritage tourism sustainable planning that act as a catalyst for tourist attractiveness and the recognisability of the destination. From the spatial-planning point of view, the competitiveness of the destination is based on the cultural experience of unique spatial units and on the regional quality of the environment and landscape, which recognize how the interaction between tourism and heritage can promote quality of the destination as a place to live, work and invest. Models of heritage tourism sustainable planning imply the harmony and balance between the global tourism standards and the preservation of the cultural identity of the destination. They are comprised of two main components: an autochthonous place and its cultural and socioeconomic characteristics and viable tourism scenario and its sustainable cultural product. A case study is carried out on the Croatian Island of Mljet, the oldest National Park in the Adriatic, the island which combines myths, legends and cultural historical processes from the stone age, the periods of Illyrians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Slavs, Republic of Dubrovnik, Austro-Hungarian empire, up to the present times. The research, based on the all stakeholder visual perception questionnaire, proves that the heritage tourism sustainable planning models must support the development of tourism without jeopardizing the spatial and socioeconomic characteristics of both natural and anthropogenic features of the area and without creating social or economic difficulties for the local community. At the same time, they must be possible to regulate the visitor capacity which is consistent with the image of the destinations’ lifescape and with the quality of the cultural tourism experience of the visitors.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Authors: | Authors Email Mrda, Ana UNSPECIFIED Caric, Hrvoje UNSPECIFIED Bojanic Obad Scitaroci, Bojana UNSPECIFIED |
Languages: | English |
Keywords: | heritage tourism; cultural landscapes; sustainable planning; lifescape; natural heritage; cultural heritage; tourism planning; sustainable planning; interaction; cultural identity; Croatia; Adriatic; stakeholder; community |
Subjects: | H.HERITAGE TYPOLOGIES > 06. Cultural landscapes I.CULTURAL TOURISM > 02. Tourism management I.CULTURAL TOURISM > 04. Sustainable tourism J.HERITAGE ECONOMICS > 05. Heritage and sustainable development L.PRESENTATION AND TRANSMISSION OF HERITAGE > 04. Public awareness P. GEOGRAPHIC AREAS > 05. Europe |
National Committee: | ICOMOS International |
ICOMOS Special Collection: | Scientific Symposium (ICOMOS General Assemblies) |
ICOMOS Special Collection Volume: | 19th General Assembly, New Delhi, 2017 |
Depositing User: | intern icomos |
Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2018 15:49 |
Last Modified: | 24 Jan 2019 14:55 |
References: | 1. Antrop M. (2005). “Why landscapes of the past are important for the future”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 70. p. 21-34. 2. Cartier, C. and Lew, A. A. (2005): Seductions of Place: Geographical Perspectives on Globalization and Touristed Landscapes (Critical Geographies). London and New York: Routledge. 3. DuplančićLeder, T., Ujević, T., Čala, M. (2004): Coastline lengths and areas of islands in the Croatian part of the Adriatic sea determined from the topographic maps at the scale of 1 : 25 000. Geoadria. 1. p. 5-32. 4. Farid, S.M. (2015). “Tourism Management in World Heritage Sites and its Impact on Economic Development in Mali and Ethiopia”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 211. p. 595-604. 5. Farina A. (2000): “The Cultural Landscape as a Model for the Integration of Ecology and Economics”. BioScience. 50. p. 313-320. 6. Gunn, C. A., (1972.): Vacationscape - designing tourist region. Austin: The Univ. Of Texas. 7. Jacobsen, J. and Steen K. (2007): “Use of landscape perception methods in tourism studies: A review of photo-based research approaches”. Tourism Geographies. 9. p. 234-253. 8. Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. (1978): Humanscape: Environments for people. Belmont, Calif: Duxbury Press. 9. Loulanski, T. and Loulanski, V. (2015): “The sustainable integration of cultural heritage and tourism: a meta-study”. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 19. p.837-862. 10. McCain, G. and Ray N.M. (2003). “Legacy tourism: the search for personal meaning in heritage travel”. Tourism Management. 24. p.713-717. 11. Metro-Roland, M. M. (2011): Tourists, Signs and the City: The Semiotics of Culture in an Urban Landscape. Farnham, England: Ashgate Publishing 12. Mrđa, A. (2015): ‘Method for Determining Tourism Carrying Capacity in Spatial Planning’, PhD, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Architecture, Zagreb. 13. Mrđa, A. and BojanićObadŠćitaroci, B. (2014): “The Importance of the Concept of Tourism Carrying Capacity for Spatial Planning - Previous Research, Development and Methodological Approaches”. Prostor. 22. p. 212-227. 14. Mrđa, A. and BojanićObadŠćitaroci, B. (2016): “Heritage touristscapes: a case study of the Island of Hvar”. Annales-AnalizaIstrske in MediteranskeStudije-Series Historia et Sociologia. 26. p. 553-572. 15. OECD. (2009). The Impact of Culture on Tourism. [Acessed October 4, 2016]. [http://www.oecd.org/cfe/tourism/theimpactofcultureontourism.htm] 16. Rodríguez-Darias, A., Santana-Talavera, A., Díaz-Rodríguez P. (2016). “Landscape Perceptions and Social Evaluation of Heritage-Building Processes”. Environmental Policy and Governance. Wiley Online Library. 17. Samsudin, P. Y. and Maliki, N. Z. (2015): “Preserving Cultural Landscape in Homestay Programme towards Sustainable Tourism: Brief critical review concept”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 170. p. 433-441. 18. Soini, K. and Vaarala, H., Pouta, E. (2012). “Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 104. p. 124-134. 19. Stebbins, R. A. (1996). “Cultural Tourism as Serious Leisure”. Annals of Tourism Research. 23. p. 948-950. 20. Stephenson, J. (2008): “The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 84. p. 127-139. 21. Swensen, G. and Jerpasen, G. B. (2008): “Cultural heritage in suburban landscape planning: A case study in Southern Norway”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 87. p. 289-300. 22. von Haaren, C. (2002): “Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural landscape”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 60. p. 73-80. 23. Vos, W., Meekes H. (1999): “Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 46. p. 3-14. |
URI: | https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/1953 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Metadata
- HTML Citation
- ASCII Citation
- Full
- OpenURL ContextObject
- EndNote
- BibTeX
- MODS
- MPEG-21 DIDL
- EP3 XML
- Dublin Core
- Reference Manager
- Eprints Application Profile
- Simple Metadata
- Refer
- METS
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year