In Support of Stylistic Reconstructions: Some Thoughts on Authenticity and Justice

Piazzoni, Maria Francesca (2018) In Support of Stylistic Reconstructions: Some Thoughts on Authenticity and Justice. ICOMOS University Forum . pp. 1-14. ISSN 2616-6968 [Article]

[img]
Preview
PDF
9_Piazzoni_corrected.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (390kB) | Preview

Abstract (in English)

Human and natural disasters destroy historic urban fabrics worldwide. How can planners and architects remediate the loss of heritage? I suggest that rebuilding damaged sites through stylistic reconstructions can promote individual and collective healings. Reconstructions provide a tangible canvas that allows individuals to rebuild their lives by reestablishing the visual wholeness and spatial consistency of the destroyed heritage. Two sets of critiques challenge my proposal. The first argues that reconstructions can only produce fake heritage because the authenticity of originals cannot be reproduced. The second concerns with the social needs of those who lost their heritage. One might argue that rebuilding does not allow “non-experts” to participate in the production of space and that reconstructions thus deny individuals their right to the city. I respond to these critiques through two considerations. First, I contend that the concerns about the authenticity of reconstructions hinge on speculative premises. As scholars have proved, both themed settings and heritage sites become authentic through everyday uses and significations. Secondly, I argue that rebuilt heritage might favour the social production of space that underlies the right to the city. Reconstructions could facilitate resignifications and appropriations by both restoring the visual integrity of destroyed sites and providing a spatial layout.

Item Type: Article
Authors:
AuthorsEmail
Piazzoni, Maria FrancescaUNSPECIFIED
Languages: English
Keywords: reconstruction; theory of conservation; theory of restoration; interpretation; collective memory; post-disaster situation; post-trauma situation; destruction of cultural heritage; historic towns; urban areas; resilience; authenticiy; debates; Social aspects; Cultural significance; Values; Rights
Subjects: A. THEORETICAL AND GENERAL ASPECTS > 09. Philosophy of conservation
A. THEORETICAL AND GENERAL ASPECTS > 12. Theory of conservation
A. THEORETICAL AND GENERAL ASPECTS > 12. Theory of restoration
D.URBANISM > 02. Urban planning
E.CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION > 02. Theory and doctrinal texts
E.CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION > 09. Social and economic aspects of conservation
H.HERITAGE TYPOLOGIES > 12. Historic towns and villages
National Committee: ICOMOS
ISSN: 2616-6968
Depositing User: Mrs Lucile Smirnov
Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2018 15:47
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2018 08:44
References: Amin, A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City, 12(1), 5–24.

Bagnall, G. (2003). Performance and performativity at heriage sites. Museum and Society, 1(2), 87–103.

Bayat, A. (2000). From ‘dangerous classes’ to ‘quiet rebels’: Politics of the urban subaltern in the global south. International Sociology, 15(3), 533–557.

Beardsworth, A., & Bryman, A. (1999). Late modernity and the dynamics of quasification: The case of the themed restaurant. The Sociological Review, 47(2), 228–257.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.

Brandi, C. (1963). Teoria del restauro. Roma: Edizioni di storia e letterature.

Certeau, de M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Chase, J., Crawford, M., & Kaliski, J. (1999). Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.

Choay, F. (1992). The Invention of the Historic Monument. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Crawford, M. (2008). The current state of everyday urbanism. In J. Chase, M. Crawford, & J. Kaliski (Eds.), Everyday urbanism: Expanded edition (pp. 12–15). New York: The Monacelli Press.

Cresswell, T. (1996). In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology, and Transgression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 8–63.

Davis, S. (1996). The theme park. Global industry and cultural form. Media Culture Society, 18, 399–422.

De Filippis, J. (2001). The myth of social capital in community development. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), 781–806.

Dikeç, M. (2001). Justice and the spatial imagination. Environment and Planning A, 33(10), 1785–1805.

Dikeç, M. (2002). Police, politics, and the right to the city. GeoJournal, 58, 91–98.

Dundes Renteln, A. (2004). The Cultural Defense. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fainstein, S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451–478.

Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The Just City. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Fincher, R., & Jacobs, J. (1998). Cities of Difference. New York: Guilford Press.

Fisher, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Fox, P. F. (1970). Whom does the advocate planner serve? Social Policy, 1, 32–37.

Halbwachs, M. (1980 [1950]). Collective Memory. New York: Harper and Row. Healey, Patsy. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

Hannigan, J. (2010). Themed environments. In R. Hutchison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of urban studies (pp. 806–810). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical Approaches. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.

Harvey, D. (2001). Heritage pasts and heritage presents: Temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4), 319–338.

Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–42.

Holtorf, C. (2005). From Stonehenge to Las Vegas: Archaeology As Popular Culture. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

Holtorf, C. (2013). On pastness: A reconsideration of materiality in archaeological object authenticity. Anthropological Quarterly, 86(2), 427–443.

Hou, J. (2010). Insurgent Public Space. New York: Routledge.

Huxtable, A. L. (1997). The Unreal America: Architecture and Illusion. New York: New Press.

Icomos. (1964). Venice Charter of Restoration. Venice: s.n.

Icomos. (1979). Burra Charter. Burra: s.n.

Icomos. (1982). Declaration of Dresden on the Reconstruction of Monuments Destroyed by War. s.l.:s.n.

Icomos. (1990). The Lausanne Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archeological Heritage. Lausanne: Icomos.

Innes, J. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183–189.

Innes, J. E. (1998). Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 52–63.

Ito, N. (1995). “Authenticity” inherent in cultural heritage in Asia and Japan. In K. E. Larsen (Ed.), Nara Conference on Authenticity (pp. 17–34). Paris: Unesco.

Iveson, K. (2013). Cities within the city: Do-it-yourself urbanism and the right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 941–956.

Jokilehto, J. (1999). A History of Architectural Conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Jokilehto, J. (2013). Reconstruction in the World Heritage Context. Rome, s.n.

Jones, S. (2010). Negotiating authentic objects and authentic selves. Beyond the deconstruction of authenticity. Journal of Material Culture, 15(2), 181–203.

Judd, D., & Fainstein, S. (1999). The Tourist City. Yale: Yale University Press.

Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1995). Theorizing heritage. Ethnomusicology, 39, 367–380.

Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum, 56(1–2), 52–65.

Knudsen, B. T., & Waade, A. M. (2010). Performative authenticty in tourism and spatial experience. Rethinking the relations between travel, place and emotion. In B. T. Knudsen, & A. M. Waade

(Eds.), Re-Investing authenticty, tourism, place and emotions (1–22). Bristol, UK: Channel View Publication.

Kohn, M. (2010). Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space. New York: Routledge.

Kuutma, K. (2012). Between arbitration and engineering: Concepts and contingencies in the shaping of heritage regimes. In R. Bendix, A. Eggert, & A Peselmann (Eds.), Heritage Regimes and the State (pp. 21–36). Göttingen: University of Göttingen Press.

Lefebvre, H. (1968 [1996]). Le droit à la ville / The right to the city. In: Writings on cities. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.

Lefebvre, H. (1974 [1991]). The Production of Space = La production de l’espace. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Logan, W., Craith, M. N., & Kockel, U. (2015). A Companion to Heritage Studies. Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lukas, S. A. (2007). The Themed Space: Locating Culture, Nation, and Self. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford.

Piazzoni, M. F. (2018, forthcoming) The Real Fake, Authenticity and the Production of Space. New York: Fordham University Press

Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. Geojournal, 58(2), 99–108.

Ross, A. (1999). The Celebration Chronicles: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Property Value in Disney’s New Town. New York: Ballantine Books.

Sandercock, L. (2000). When strangers become neighbours: Managing cities of difference. Planning Theory & Practice, 1(1), 13–30.

Sandercock, L., & Lyssiotis, P. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities in the 21st Century. London: Continuum.

Smith, L., & Campbell, G. (2015). The elephant in the room: Heritage, affect, and emotion. In W. Logan, M. Craith, & U. Kockel (Eds.), A companion to heritage studies (pp. 443–460). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Smith, L. J. (2006). The Uses of Heritage. New York: Routledge.

Sorkin, M. (1992). Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Hill and Wang.

UNESCO. (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: s.n.

Urry, J. (1999). Sensing the City. In D. Judd, & S. Fainstein, The Tourist city (pp. 71-88). Yale University Press.

Urry, J., & Larsen, J. (2011). The Tourist Gaze, 3rd edition. London: Sage.

Vannini, P. (2011). Authenticity. In D. Southerton (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consumer culture (pp. 74–76). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Vasudevan, A. (2015). The autonomous city: Towards a critical geography of occupation. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 316–337.

Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 349–370.

Warren, S. (2005). Saying no to Disney: Disney demise in four American cities. In M. Budd & M. Kirch (Eds.), Rethinking Disney: Private control, public dimension (pp. 231–259). Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

Winter, T. (2015). Heritagescaping and the aesthetic of refuge: Challenges to urban sustainability. In W. Logan, M. Craith, & U. Kockel (Eds.), A companion to heritage studies (pp. 189–202). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Yung, E. H., & Chan, E. H. (2011). Problem issues of public participation in built-heritage conservation: Two controversial cases in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 35, 457–466.

Zukin, S. (1991). Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Zukin, S. (2010). Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
URI: http://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/1860

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Metadata

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

© ICOMOS
http://www.international.icomos.org
openarchive(at)icomos.org