Reconstruction And Conservation In The Post-Truth Era. Historical Lies, Authenticity, Material Evidence

Sulfaro, Nino (2018) Reconstruction And Conservation In The Post-Truth Era. Historical Lies, Authenticity, Material Evidence. ICOMOS University Forum . pp. 1-11. ISSN 2616-6968 [Article]

Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract (in English)

The paper proposes some short reflections on two possible practices in the field of restoration of architectural heritage: reconstructing a vanished or ruined artefact or preserving the signs of its destruction or damage. The author deals with these two truly conflicting choices, underlining the opportunity not to compromise the possibility of future generations interpreting history on the basis of a wide range of material and verifiable sources. This aspect seems particularly relevant, especially in the light of the current ‘post-truth era’ problems, such as historical revisionism, manipulation of the recent and distant past and, more in general, a widespread relativism about knowledge. Starting from a consideration on the notion of “temporal paradox”, the author – also through some case studies – focuses on the risks generated by the option to cancel or alter history without generating subsequent unforeseen consequences. Alternatively, an approach aimed at preserving traces of the past can be used as a tool for historiography, as this material evidence can be used as an essential source to reconstruct history, in the future.

Item Type: Article
Sulfaro, Nino
Languages: English
Keywords: reconstruction; theory of conservation; theory of restoration; presentation; Cultural significance; Social aspects; Values; interpretation; collective memory; historiography; case studies; authenticiy; post-disaster situation; post-trauma situation; destruction of cultural heritage; man-made disasters; natural disasters
Subjects: A. THEORETICAL AND GENERAL ASPECTS > 09. Philosophy of conservation
A. THEORETICAL AND GENERAL ASPECTS > 12. Theory of conservation
A. THEORETICAL AND GENERAL ASPECTS > 12. Theory of restoration
E.CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION > 02. Theory and doctrinal texts
E.CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION > 09. Social and economic aspects of conservation
Name of monument, town, site, museum: Bardo Museum, Tunis, Tunisia; Sarajevo National Library, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Frauenkirche, Dresden, Germany
National Committee: ICOMOS International
ISSN: 2616-6968
Depositing User: ICOMOS DocCentre
Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2018 15:47
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2018 08:44
References: Bellini A. 1980. Ricchi apparati e povere idee, in «Restauro» 51, pp.73-80.

Bellini A. 1985. Teorie del restauro e conservazione architettonica, in Id., (edited by), Tecniche della conservazione, Franco Angeli, Milan, pp. 9-56.

Bevan R. 2006. The destruction of memory: architecture at war, Reaktion Books, London.

Bloch M. 1953. The Historian’s Craft, Knopf, New York.

Boscarino S., Prescia R. 1992 (eds). Il restauro di necessità, Franco Angeli, Milan.

Cognardi A. 1981 (eds), Belice 1980: luoghi, problemi e progetti dodici anni dopo il terremoto, Marsilio, Venice.

Dezzi Bardeschi M. 1991. Restauro. Punto e da capo, Franco Angeli, Milan.

Eco U. 1990. I limiti dell’interpretazione, Bompiani, Milan.

Eco U. 1997. Kant e l’ornitorinco, Bombiani, Milan.

Garland Thomson R. 2008? From Mostar to Manhattan: Authenticity in the Context of Post-Conflict Reconstruction, in « CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship», Vol. 5/1;

Huyssen 2003 - A. Huyssen, Present pasts: urban palimpsests and the politics of memory, Standford University Press, Stanford 2003.

Kalman H. 2017. Destruction, mitigation, and reconciliation of cultural heritage, in International Journal of Heritage Studies Vol. 23 / 6, pp. 538-555. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2017.1289475.

Keyes R. 2004. The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life, St. Martin's Press, New York.

Larsen K.E., Jokhileto J. 1995 (eds.), Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, 1994: Nara, Japan, UNESCO, Paris.

Mazzucchelli F. 2010. Urbicidio. Il senso dei luoghi tra distruzioni e ricostruzioni nella ex Jugoslavia, Bononia University Press, Bologna.

Oteri A.M. 2009. Rovine. Visioni, teorie, restauri del rudere in architettura, Argos, Rome.

Sulfaro N. 2014. «A Memory of Shadows and of Stone». Traumatic Ruins, Conservation, Social Processes, in ArcHistoR I, 2, pp. 144-181; DOI: 10.14633/AHR012 –

Sulfaro N. 2017. ‘Difficult heritage’: the use and reuse of prisons, sites of massacres and of other problematic places, in Fiorani, D., Kealy, L., Musso, S. F. editors. Conservation/ Adaptation: keeping alive the spirit of the place. Adaptive reuse of heritage with ‘symbolic value’, EAAE Transactions on Architectural Education no. 65. EAAE Hasselt, Belgium. pp. 317-324.

Tumarkin M. 2005. Traumascapes. The power and fate of places transformed by tragedy, Melbourne University Press, Victoria.

Trigg D. 2009. The place of trauma: Memory, hauntings, and the temporality of ruins, in “Memory studies” II,1, pp. 87-101; DOI: 10.1177/1750698008097397-

Violi P. 2014. Paesaggi della memoria: il trauma, lo spazio, la storia, Bompiani, Milan.

Vitiello V. 2015. Né “completamenti” né “ricostruzioni” per il Grande Cretto di Burri, in ANANKE 76, pp. 108-110.

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item



Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics